Skip to main content

Andrew Barbeau

Technical Expert Testimony

Andrew Barbeau

Technical expert Andrew Barbeau, President of the energy consultancy The Analysis Group, testified that ComEd must change the way its performance is measured to meet the requirements of the Climate and Equitable Jobs Act (CEJA).

ComEd’s proposed metrics do not require it to differentiate between locations within its system, even though research shows that service varied greatly depending on where customers lived: frontline communities in Chicago had outages 83% more frequently and for 140% longer than other Chicago communities.

Barbeau proposed that the Illinois Commerce Commission require ComEd to use equity-focused metrics that reflect CEJA goals and that would improve the level and reliability of services provided to frontline communities. An example is the Reliability and Resiliency in Vulnerable Communities Metric. Including “resiliency” in the metric reflects the need to account for impacts of outages on customers, given that wealthier communities can withstand and recover from electricity outages better than more vulnerable communities. He also described the need for metrics that encourage development of distributed energy resources.

Barbeau described in detail how he arrived at four metrics that would help measure and hold ComEd accountable for providing equitable electric services in frontline communities.

The Commission agreed in September 2022, requiring the utility to increase the beneficial impact of reliability upgrades within frontline communities in order to receive a performance incentive. The Commission noted that it shared EDF’s concerns that frontline communities are burdened by longer and more frequent outages than other communities.

Summary

ComEd’s proposal to use system-wide metrics to measure reliability disadvantages the residents of more vulnerable frontline communities. Instead, the needs of these communities must be front and center in the utility’s plans.

Are you interested in testifying in a utility rate case?
Learn More
Become a certified energy justice intervenor.
Join the Movement

More Testimonies

Microphone in a court room
Community Expert Testimony

Wasiu Adesope

Community expert Cheryl Watson testified that utility policies contribute to and exacerbate cumulative burdens to disadvantaged communities and must be changed. Utilities need to be more holistic and community centered, planning with the community, not for them.
Microphone in a court room
Technical Expert Testimony

Andrew Barbeau

Technical expert Andrew Barbeau testified that ComEd’s proposal to use system-wide metrics to measure reliability disadvantages the residents of more vulnerable frontline communities. Instead, the needs of these communities must be front and center in the utility’s plans.
Microphone in a court room
Community Expert Testimony

Gregory Norris

Community expert Gregory Norris, founder of an environmental justice organization, testified that lack of affordable energy has an outsized impact on Black and brown neighborhoods. Solutions will only be implemented justly if there is intention and accountability. ComEd can use tenets of energy justice to guide grid planning.
Microphone in a court room
Community Expert Testimony

Kelly McCleary

Community expert Kelly McCleary testified that higher rates can lead to a cascade of problems. The higher rates get, the fewer customers will be able to afford to invest in clean energy, including energy efficiency, and save in the future. Utilities should invest in making the grid more ready for renewable energy, not just user rate hikes to garner higher profits for shareholders.
Microphone in a court room
Community Expert Testimony

Ryan O’Donnell

Community expert Ryan O'Donnell testified that communities should have energy sovereignty, meaning some degree of ownership over the means of energy production. Benefits of the Climate and Equitable Jobs Act (CEJA) should be visible, making the system more fair and balanced environmentally and economically.
Microphone in a court room
Community Expert Testimony

Cheryl Watson

Community expert Cheryl Watson testified that utility policies contribute to and exacerbate cumulative burdens to disadvantaged communities and must be changed. Utilities need to be more holistic and community centered, planning with the community, not for them.
Microphone in a court room
Technical Expert Testimony

Justin Schott

Technical expert Justin Schott testified that Peoples Gas’ disconnection and late fee practices and qualifications for low-income discounts are placing undue energy burdens on BIPOC communities.
Microphone in a court room
Technical Expert Testimony

Chris Neme

Technical expert Chris Neme testified that transitioning single-family homes from gas furnaces to electricity is cost-effective for the average homeowner in Peoples Gas service territory.

Related Posts

Illinois Commerce Commission chair announces decision favoring clean energy
Media Article

Advocates hail regulatory ‘earthquake’ as state slashes requested gas rate increases

Illinois regulators unanimously approved rate hikes for four major natural gas utilities, but slashed the utilities' requested rate increases by as much as 50%. The regulators also launched a series of "future of gas" hearings that will for the first time hold the utilities accountable for aligning their planning with the state's 100% clean energy goals. "As the state embarks on a journey toward a 100% clean energy economy, the gas system's operations will not continue to exist in its current form," the Commission's Chairman said in a statement.
Customers read a utility bill
BlogFeatured

Equity, Affordability and Access in the Clean Energy Transition

As states turn toward a clean energy transition, affordability and access must be an integral part of the discussion. Otherwise, equity may be compromised. Black and Brown communities experience higher energy rates and higher rates of power disconnection due to many overlapping historical and modern factors such as housing injustice, racial segregation, and wealth disparities. On average, Black and Hispanic households are at least two times more likely to have their utility service, a critical basic need, disconnected than White households. Further, to cut down on their cost of energy, some households may resort to adjusting temperatures to unhealthy levels, resulting in negative health impacts. This further contributes to disparate health impacts experienced by Black and Brown communities. Equity and affordability on regulators’ radar In Massachusetts, the Department of Public Utilities recently determined that total energy burdens should be no more than six percent of shelter costs. In addition, the DPU is seeking further stakeholder comments on where target levels (below six percent) should be set when designing tiered discount rates that benefit the highest number of customers. The DPU is also seeking comments on whether revenue shortfalls from discounted rates should be recovered statewide instead of utility-wide, and whether all stakeholders should contribute to recovery of the revenue shortfall. Through these investigations, the DPU is for the first time working to increase energy affordability for Massachusetts ratepayers. Energy regulatory commissions around the country are, like Massachusetts, beginning to address issues of equity, affordability and access. As states strive to meet their climate goals in the coming years by transitioning to an electric-powered grid, energy affordability is more important than ever from an environmental justice and equity perspective. Currently, the federal government provides funding to states to support low-income ratepayers. Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) provides federal funding assistance to reduce the costs associated with home energy bills, energy crises, weatherization, and minor energy-related home repairs. States receive the funding and distribute it based on their own policies. States and individual utility companies also provide various payment assistance programs. Although helpful, such programs do not fully address the energy burdens faced by many households. Further, many people are not enrolled in any kind of low-income assistance program because they do not self-identify as low-income, therefore marketing for financial support programs needs to be improved to increase enrollment. Many middle-income people are also struggling to afford high energy bills that are taking a large chunk out of their income, but they do not qualify under the income thresholds for low-income assistance programs. More data, language access will help State energy regulators should collect more data about the usage behaviors for different households and demographics to help people determine the programs that could relieve some of the burden of their energy bill. Regulators should also look to ensure low-income customers have access to and can benefit from clean energy infrastructure. Energy regulators should consider ways to leverage funding from the Inflation Reduction Act and other sources to provide heat pump rebates to low- and moderate-income homes. They should also consider novel approaches, such as percentage of income payment plans. This rate structure avoids leaving median-income individuals without support. As state energy regulators navigate the clean energy transition and equity issues, they must also consider language access, which. ensures that everyone can receive information on how to access rate support programs. State energy regulators should consider implementing current EPA guidance on best practices for language access, which includes translating information into every language spoken by at least five percent of people in the relevant area. State energy regulators should err on the side of over-inclusivity in translation to non-English languages. Environmental justice must be considered in every aspect of the energy transition. From access to translated information to access to heat in the middle of winter, no one should be left behind. EDF is working to ensure that equity concerns are at the forefront of policy conversations at public utility commissions. Haley Maher is a third year law student at the University of Colorado. This blog is based on her research as an intern at Environmental Defense Fund in summer 2024.   Memmott, T., Carley, S., Graff, M. et al. Sociodemographic disparities in energy insecurity among low-income households before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat Energy 6, 186–193 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00763-9 DPU Issues Notice of Investigation on Energy Affordability for Massachusetts Ratepayers, Department of Public Utilities, https://www.mass.gov/news/dpu-issues-notice-of-investigation-on-energy-affordability-for-massachusetts-ratepayers Affordability and Energy Bills, Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies, https://puc.colorado.gov/affordability#:~:text=The%20Commission's%20Affordability%20Initiative%20demonstrates,a%20letter%20from%20Governor%20Polis. Massachusetts Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), Benefits.gov, last accessed Aug 6, 2024, https://www.benefits.gov/benefit/1576 Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), Benefits.gov, https://www.benefits.gov/benefit/623 About Us, Mass Save, Last accessed Aug. 6 2024, https://www.masssave.com/en/about-us Paying for Power a Struggle for Some, Consumer Watchdog, https://consumerwatchdog.org/uncategorized/paying-power-struggle-some/ Guidance to Environmental Protection Agency Financial Assistance Recipients Regarding Title VI Prohibition Against National Origin Discrimination Affecting Limited English Proficient Persons, 69 F.R. 35602, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2004-06-25/pdf/04- 14464.pdf
Boston, Massachusetts, USA Skyline
Media Article

The richest Americans account for 40 percent of U.S. climate emissions

The richest 10 percent of U.S. households are responsible for 40 percent of the country’s greenhouse gas emissions, according to a study released Thursday in PLOS Climate. The study, which looked at how a household’s income generated emissions, underlines the stark divide between those who benefit most from fossil fuels and those who are most burdened by its effects. “It just seems morally and politically problematic to have one group of people reaping so much benefit from emissions while the poorer groups in society are asked to disproportionately deal with the harms of those emissions,” Starr, a sustainability scientist at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, said. Previous research has shown that extreme weather events made worse because of climate change, from flooding to hurricanes, often have a greater effect on lower-income communities.
Dr. Jifunza Wright-Carter speaks at a protest
Media Article

Farmers Reject Nicor’s Pipe Dream

An article from In These Times discusses why Black farmers in Pembroke, IL want an energy upgrade to renewables, not fossil fuels.
Environmental Defense Fund logo
Blacks in Green logo
Community Voices in Energy Logo White
About Us
Toolkit
Resources
News & Updates
FAQ
Get Involved
Contact
Privacy Notice
Terms of Use
Subscribe to our mailing list to receive quarterly news and updates.
Subscribe