Skip to main content

For decades, the communities most affected by energy utilities’ actions have been excluded from the regulatory process. Until now.

Cheryl watson has lived for 60 years in the same bungalow where she grew up in Chatham, on the south side of Chicago. For most people, losing electricity is an inconvenience, but in a community such as Chatham, a power outage can quickly become a crisis.

Chatham resident Cheryl Watson stands in her front yard.

Chatham resident Cheryl Watson stands in her front yard. Photo: WBEZ

“Houses around here didn’t need AC when I was growing up, but now climate change means they do,” says Watson. “When we lose power in the summer, it can become a medical emergency for older folks like me.” Chronic disinvestment in Chatham compounds these risks. “If there’s even a little rain, the neighborhood floods and you’re trapped, and the nearest decent hospital is miles away.”

What’s worse, communities like Chatham are more likely to experience a dangerous power failure. In Chicago, power outages are 83% more frequent, and last 140% longer, in low-wealth areas and communities of color compared to whiter, wealthier communities.

These disparities are perpetuated when community members don’t have a seat at the table when energy decisions are being made. EDF attorney Christie Hicks is supporting community efforts to get community voices into the room where it happens.

Utilities are regulated by small, technocratic bodies called public utility commissions. Often composed of three to five members appointed by the governor, they control what rates utilities can charge, how they distribute costs between residential and industrial customers and what energy infrastructure they can build.

People who submit testimony during a commission’s public hearings are generally engineers, economists, scientists, “or someone else with a lot of letters after their name,” says Hicks.

There’s no legal reason why a community member can’t testify. But there are a lot of barriers.

“You need an attorney, you have to understand this really nuanced body of law, and make sense of some truly arcane language and procedures,” says Hicks. Plus, it’s not how things have historically been done at these slow to evolve commissions.

If people from frontline communities, who are the keepers of their community’s history, are not at the table, then history is destined to be repeated.

– Cheryl Watson, community advocate

Hicks is developing a system for collecting and incorporating testimony from community members into public utility legal proceedings. It’s a little like collecting citizen science, but in a legal context. She’s researching different techniques that community members can use to document what is really going on in their communities, like the lingering effects of shuttered fossil fuel facilities. Hicks and her team are also evaluating cases where this kind of testimony will have the biggest impact.

“The goal is to have lived experience in an impacted community recognized as a legitimate form of expertise,” says Hicks.

Her initial efforts are already paying off. Hicks recently worked with Watson to submit testimony in a case about evaluating utility performance. The commission sided with Watson and EDF and will require the utility to provide data that will clearly show if certain neighborhoods are receiving less reliable service than others. And the utility will have a portion of its profits tied to how it performs, based on these equity focused numbers.

“It all begins with who is at the table when decisions are being made,” says Watson. “If people from frontline communities, who are the keepers of their community’s history, are not at the table, then history is destined to be repeated.”

Changing how utilities do business takes a lot of work and isn’t going to happen overnight, says Hicks. But she is motivated by the community leaders she works with, who are relentless in their push for progress.

“As one of my community members likes to remind me,” says Hicks, “it ain’t over till we win.”

View Original Article

Sign up for our emails and stay up to date with Community Voices in Energy.

Media Article

Consumer advocates say regulators should slash Ameren Illinois’ proposed $134M rate hike

Consumer advocates are pushing back against Ameren Illinois’ $134 million rate hike request for natural gas services that’s currently before state regulators. The watchdog groups contend the Illinois Commerce Commission, the state regulatory body, should reject at least two-thirds of the proposal. “t Ameren’s bid for a $134 million rate hike is unjust, unreasonable — and at least triple what the utility can possibly justify,” said Jim Chilsen, a spokesman for the Citizens Utility Boardy. The affordability issues and reducing expenditures on infrastructure by Ameren are “also the best solutions for a healthy, livable planet,” said Curt Stokes, an attorney with the Environmental Defense Fund. “Expanding and just doubling down on investments in this natural gas distribution system is not going to get Illinois to a zero carbon economy by 2050,” Stokes said.
FeaturedMedia Article

Illinois to receive $430 million to reduce climate pollution

The US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) announced that Illinois will receive more than $430 million in Climate Pollution Reduction Grants, thanks to the Inflation Reduction Act, to tackle climate pollution, improve air quality, and advance environmental justice across the state. Grant funds will support building and industry decarbonization, freight electrification, climate-smart agriculture, and renewable energy.
Media Article

Massachusetts outlines new strategy for getting customers and utilities off gas

After more than three years of considering the future of the natural gas industry in Massachusetts and what role it can play in the state's efforts to significantly reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, the state's Department of Public Utilities issued an order meant to signal to gas utilities that it won't be business as usual going forward.

Leave a Reply