Skip to main content

For decades, the communities most affected by energy utilities’ actions have been excluded from the regulatory process. Until now.

Cheryl watson has lived for 60 years in the same bungalow where she grew up in Chatham, on the south side of Chicago. For most people, losing electricity is an inconvenience, but in a community such as Chatham, a power outage can quickly become a crisis.

Chatham resident Cheryl Watson stands in her front yard.

Chatham resident Cheryl Watson stands in her front yard. Photo: WBEZ

“Houses around here didn’t need AC when I was growing up, but now climate change means they do,” says Watson. “When we lose power in the summer, it can become a medical emergency for older folks like me.” Chronic disinvestment in Chatham compounds these risks. “If there’s even a little rain, the neighborhood floods and you’re trapped, and the nearest decent hospital is miles away.”

What’s worse, communities like Chatham are more likely to experience a dangerous power failure. In Chicago, power outages are 83% more frequent, and last 140% longer, in low-wealth areas and communities of color compared to whiter, wealthier communities.

These disparities are perpetuated when community members don’t have a seat at the table when energy decisions are being made. EDF attorney Christie Hicks is supporting community efforts to get community voices into the room where it happens.

Utilities are regulated by small, technocratic bodies called public utility commissions. Often composed of three to five members appointed by the governor, they control what rates utilities can charge, how they distribute costs between residential and industrial customers and what energy infrastructure they can build.

People who submit testimony during a commission’s public hearings are generally engineers, economists, scientists, “or someone else with a lot of letters after their name,” says Hicks.

There’s no legal reason why a community member can’t testify. But there are a lot of barriers.

“You need an attorney, you have to understand this really nuanced body of law, and make sense of some truly arcane language and procedures,” says Hicks. Plus, it’s not how things have historically been done at these slow to evolve commissions.

If people from frontline communities, who are the keepers of their community’s history, are not at the table, then history is destined to be repeated.

– Cheryl Watson, community advocate

Hicks is developing a system for collecting and incorporating testimony from community members into public utility legal proceedings. It’s a little like collecting citizen science, but in a legal context. She’s researching different techniques that community members can use to document what is really going on in their communities, like the lingering effects of shuttered fossil fuel facilities. Hicks and her team are also evaluating cases where this kind of testimony will have the biggest impact.

“The goal is to have lived experience in an impacted community recognized as a legitimate form of expertise,” says Hicks.

Her initial efforts are already paying off. Hicks recently worked with Watson to submit testimony in a case about evaluating utility performance. The commission sided with Watson and EDF and will require the utility to provide data that will clearly show if certain neighborhoods are receiving less reliable service than others. And the utility will have a portion of its profits tied to how it performs, based on these equity focused numbers.

“It all begins with who is at the table when decisions are being made,” says Watson. “If people from frontline communities, who are the keepers of their community’s history, are not at the table, then history is destined to be repeated.”

Changing how utilities do business takes a lot of work and isn’t going to happen overnight, says Hicks. But she is motivated by the community leaders she works with, who are relentless in their push for progress.

“As one of my community members likes to remind me,” says Hicks, “it ain’t over till we win.”

View Original Article

Sign up for our emails and stay up to date with Community Voices in Energy.

Media Article

Massachusetts outlines new strategy for getting customers and utilities off gas

After more than three years of considering the future of the natural gas industry in Massachusetts and what role it can play in the state's efforts to significantly reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, the state's Department of Public Utilities issued an order meant to signal to gas utilities that it won't be business as usual going forward.
Illinois Commerce Commission chair announces decision favoring clean energy
Media Article

Advocates hail regulatory ‘earthquake’ as state slashes requested gas rate increases

Illinois regulators unanimously approved rate hikes for four major natural gas utilities, but slashed the utilities' requested rate increases by as much as 50%. The regulators also launched a series of "future of gas" hearings that will for the first time hold the utilities accountable for aligning their planning with the state's 100% clean energy goals. "As the state embarks on a journey toward a 100% clean energy economy, the gas system's operations will not continue to exist in its current form," the Commission's Chairman said in a statement.
Media Article

Peoples Gas seeks record-high gas bill increase for customers

Environmental and community activists turned out in Chicago to protest against Peoples Gas' request for a $402 million rate hike for next year. "We don’t think consumers should be having to spend more money to rebuild fossil fuel pipelines," said activist Caroline Wooten. Dozens of activists showed up to Thursday's Illinois Commerce Commission meeting to make their final plea before the commission votes on November 16.

Leave a Reply