Skip to main content

Energy Democracy 101

Training

Energy Democracy 101

What is Energy Democracy?

Energy democracy shifts decision-making power to communities and individuals so that those impacted make decisions about their energy system. Under energy democracy, working people, low-income communities, and communities of color and their allies take control of energy resources and decision-making from the corporate energy establishment to build local organizing power and invest in their communities.

A democratized energy system protects biological and cultural diversity by being

  • Decentralized
  • (Re)Distributed
  • Diversified

Four Major Issues

The Energy Democracy Scorecard, developed by Emerald Cities Collaborative, is designed to help communities assess their current energy system and identify paths forward toward the goal of energy democracy. The scorecard measures four major issues that must be addressed for energy democracy to be possible:

  • Social Justice: Equitable access to rights, opportunities, economic wealth, and social privilege, not pre-determined by race, ethnicity, class, or any other socially-determined oppression. An energy system employing social justice uses reparations and reinvestment in energy, environment, and climate.
  • Regenerative Energy Systems: Reparations and reinvestment in energy justice, environmental and climate justice. Regenerative energy systems are renewable, resilient, sustainable, and collectively owned. These systems replenish/heal/fortify our natural and human environments and recognize them as interdependent.
  • Moral Economy: A moral energy economy is renewable (source), de-commodified (use vs. exchange), sustainable (eco-focused), resilient (distributed), and shared (commons/ownership). A moral economy recognizes and respects the dignity of all workers, provides equal opportunity for everyone to support themselves and their families, and creates a level playing field for all.
  • Co-governance: Addresses how decisions are made, who controls the energy planning and political process, and where ownership ultimately lies. Co-governance fosters an energy system that is inclusive and participatory, uses cooperative or shared economics, and is regenerative and sustainable.

How to Measure and Make Progress Toward Energy Democracy

For each of the four issues, communities can begin by mapping current/existing and future/desired energy systems, identifying barriers to progress, and taking steps to advance toward energy democracy. The following questions and topics may prompt these important conversations.

  • Social justice: How can energy systems address environmental racism?
    Health impacts of energy systems; siting of energy plants; land use; reparations for past harm; ownership and decision-making power; poverty/energy costs as a percent of household income. Do energy projects strengthen the community through jobs or economic benefits?
  • Regenerative energy systems: Are energy systems culturally appropriate?Honoring people and non-humans; commitment to invest in Black and brown communities. Is energy community-owned, locally generated, and decentralized, as well as clean and renewable?
  • Moral economy: Are the economics of energy systems beneficial to workers and the community? Labor practices; workforce training; local hiring; worker training; energy generation is cooperatively owned and financed to benefit the community.
  • Co-governance: Is the energy ownership structure democratized? Labor and community ownership; local procurement; priority given to projects that support Black, brown, and Indigenous communities.

Conclusion

The Energy Democracy Scorecard and framework are helpful in defining benchmarks from which to initiate transformational progress. The topics and questions outlined above can help focus community advocacy away from just identifying problems toward finding solutions, setting priorities, and taking action to create a new, just, resilient, affordable, and equitable energy reality.

Are you interested in testifying in a utility rate case?
Become a certified energy justice intervenor.

Additional Trainings

Utility rate case hero image
Training

What is a Utility Rate Case

Natural gas and electricity utilities are subject to special government rules, and the amount of…
Ethical Storytelling training featured image
Training

Ethical Storytelling

Ethical storytelling puts people and communities who have been harmed together with organizations, collaborating to…
Energy Democracy 101 training featured image
Training

Energy Democracy 101

In an energy democracy, frontline communities and their allies have a strong voice and leading…
Training

Foundations of Energy Equity

In an equitable energy system, everyone has access to safe and reliable energy and the…
Energy Policy Trends training featured image
Training

Energy Policy Trends

Covers trends in clean energy, emerging issues in energy policy, and recent legislation and policies.
electric transmission lines lower electricity costs for consumers
Training

Utility Tactics: How Utilities Achieve Their Goals

Utilities generally aim to protect shareholders by increasing profits and decreasing costs. Utilities have an…
urban lights at night in winter
Media Article

Understanding energy behaviors for a more equitable future

Dr. Destenie Nock published a new study based on research in Chicago showing that low-income households turn on their cooling systems in hot weather three degrees later than higher income households, but they turn on heat in cold weather six degrees earlier than high income households, whether because of poor insulation or other reasons. “This work highlights the challenges low-income communities face. Not only are they at higher risk in the summer, but in the winter they have to spend a lot more money to protect their pipes from freezing,” noted Nock. “The financial stress of heating homes in winter can also lead to broader inequities.” Dr. Nock's data can be used to shape policies that address systemic inequities, guide investments in infrastructure, and help improve living conditions for energy-insecure and vulnerable households. Dr. Nock has provided expert testimony in Illinois rate case proceedings.
Naomi Davis, the founder of Blacks in Green, speaks to a crowd in downtown Chicago at a March 27 protest of Peoples Gas’ proposed rate increase. (Capitol News Illinois photo by Andrew Adams)
Media Article

Advocates Call on Regulators to Reject Natural Gas Rate Increases

Consumer advocates, environmentalists and Chicago residents gathered in front of the Chicago offices of Peoples Gas this week to call on the Illinois Commerce Commission to reject a proposed rate increase from the gas utility.
Illinois Commerce Commission chair announces decision favoring clean energy
Media Article

Advocates hail regulatory ‘earthquake’ as state slashes requested gas rate increases

Illinois regulators unanimously approved rate hikes for four major natural gas utilities, but slashed the utilities' requested rate increases by as much as 50%. The regulators also launched a series of "future of gas" hearings that will for the first time hold the utilities accountable for aligning their planning with the state's 100% clean energy goals. "As the state embarks on a journey toward a 100% clean energy economy, the gas system's operations will not continue to exist in its current form," the Commission's Chairman said in a statement.
Energy Democracy 101 training hero image
Press Release

Peoples Gas Rate Case Decision Pivotal for Customers and Clean Energy Transition

CHICAGO (Nov 16, 2023) – The Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) decided today on a controversial Peoples Gas rate case which environmental and public interest organizations applaud as a departure from previous rate proceedings and an overall victory benefiting customers. The Commission rejected a significant part of Peoples rate hike request, disallowing $265 million that Peoples requested for new pipes and $236 million for new buildings. Additionally, the Commission ordered the company to participate in a Future of Gas proceeding and to file new plans for its system every two years. The Commission made similar orders in Nicor Gas and Ameren Gas rate cases, collectively reducing utility rate requests by many millions of dollars. “Today’s decision marks critical progress in the fight for a cleaner, more affordable energy future. We applaud the ICC for hearing community concerns. And we also know there’s still a long road ahead for environmental justice communities like mine, where the cost of natural gas goes beyond just unaffordable rates,” says Cheryl Johnson, Executive Director of People for Community Recovery. “Across Chicago’s south and west sides, legacy contamination and poor outdoor air quality have contributed to disproportionate rates of respiratory illness. Gas stoves are making those worse. We’re glad to see the ICC pushing pause on future gas infrastructure investments and we hope Mayor Johnson and the Chicago city council take an important next step by supporting policies that transition homes and buildings away from dirty, expensive natural gas.” This decision comes at a time where Illinoians are struggling to pay their bills and as advocates call for a transition away from the gas system to meet our state climate goals. The ICC's determination in the gas rate case provides some concrete steps in achieving those objectives, according to advocates. “This decision is forward-thinking because it signals a commitment to our State’s climate goals by providing an actual framework for equitably winding down the gas system,” says Madeline Semanisin, NRDC Midwest Building Decarbonzation Advocate. The Commission rejected the company’s proposed fixed charge and implemented a robust low income discount program. These changes can lead to lower customer bills and promote and reward energy efficiency. “This order is virtually unprecedented in terms of changing the system that for far too long has benefited utilities at the expense of consumers,” says Rob Kelter, Managing Attorney, Environmental Law & Policy Center. “Today reflects the commitment from the commission and Governor Pritzker to reduce carbon emissions and move toward electrification and renewable energy. The ICC made it clear today that it will take charge of a robust planning process that will accelerate that shift.” The decision mandates a Future of Gas proceeding that will lay the groundwork for a comprehensive strategy to address the long-term challenges associated with the gas system. “Today’s decision is a major victory for Chicagoans forced to pay ever-escalating bills for the failing Peoples Gas pipe replacement program. At long-last, regulators are holding Peoples Gas and its troubled program accountable,” says Abe Scarr, Director of Illinois PIRG. “Today we got three decisions from the Illinois Commerce Commission that are a really big deal. Illinois just took vital steps toward aligning its gas systems with its overall clean energy goals, and toward affordable power for all Illinois families in the future,” says Christie Hicks, Senior Director for Equitable Regulatory Solutions for Environmental Defense Fund. ###