Skip to main content

Utility Tactics: How Utilities Achieve Their Goals

Training

Utility Tactics: How Utilities Achieve Their Goals

Background: How public utilities were formed

Utilities were initially created to facilitate investment in a public service that was difficult for individuals to provide on their own. In the 1930s, agreements were reached in states to create regulated monopoly utilities, usually investor-owned. Other ownership structures, such as municipal ownership and electric coops, have generally less commission oversight.

In Illinois, utilities are required to deliver reliable electricity that’s as clean and low-cost as possible. As described in state documents, electricity must me “adequate, efficient, reliable, environmentally safe, and least cost.

In exchange for their service, utilities are allowed to recover costs and a profit, called a “guaranteed rate of return.” In Illinois, ICC reviews and approves costs that are “prudent and reasonable.”

Utilities generally aim to protect shareholders by increasing profits and decreasing costs. Utilities have an incentive to build out infrastructure: for operational costs they can only recoup the cost of operations, but for capital investments they can recoup costs plus a profit.

Utility influence

Utilities aim to maintain a positive brand image and minimize outside influence. They derive their influence through enormous lobbying expenses, and through allies in the oil and gas industry such as the Koch Brothers, Edison Electric Institute, the American Petroleum Institute, American Gas Association, and “big oil” including Exxon, Shell and BP.

Big oil takes in enormous earnings — $32.6 billion in just Q1 of 2023 — and spends an enormous amount on lobbying: five oil companies spent a combined $452.6 million lobbying the federal government since 2011, and around $750 million annually on climate-focused communications.

Problematic tactics

Greenwashing

Companies make commitments toward a cleaner energy future but their actions do not align with this vision. Most big oil lobbying money goes toward policies that are oppositional to clean energy progress and international climate commitments. Gas companies misleadingly market themselves as “clean,” even move away from saying “oil” and “gas” in favor of terms like “integrated energy.”

Misinformation through media

Influencers, social media and others amplify misinformation, with messages such as: “it would be dangerous to rely only on renewables,” “don’t let anyone take away your energy choices,” “food tastes better cooked on a gas range,” or “solar is a trick by wealthy people to make poor people pay more for their energy.” Historically, media have failed to connect climate impacts to climate change or fossil fuels, much less naming the companies most responsible for the problem.

Using donations to build support and advance goals

Utilities often give money to local groups and political leaders to quell criticism and mute voices for change.

Investing in costly fossil fuel infrastructure that blocks clean energy progress

Fossil infrastructure proposals baked into integrated resource plans, and incentives for false solutions like hydrogen and carbon capture, result in profits staying in the hands of the few, preserving the old energy ways.

New policies could start to change the model

  • Ban or limit utility political spending
  • Ensure customer payments are not being used to enable utilities to pay for trade association membership dues or to lobby against community interests.
  • Implement performance-based incentives or ratemaking that provide
  • Conduct third party evaluations on programs (energy efficiency, bill assistance, outreach, workforce diversity)
  • Integrated Resource Plans with equitable investments in clean energy and energy efficiency measures
Are you interested in testifying in a utility rate case?
Become a certified energy justice intervenor.

Additional Trainings

Utility rate case hero image
Training

What is a Utility Rate Case

Natural gas and electricity utilities are subject to special government rules, and the amount of…
Ethical Storytelling training featured image
Training

Ethical Storytelling

Ethical storytelling puts people and communities who have been harmed together with organizations, collaborating to…
Energy Democracy 101 training featured image
Training

Energy Democracy 101

In an energy democracy, frontline communities and their allies have a strong voice and leading…
Training

Foundations of Energy Equity

In an equitable energy system, everyone has access to safe and reliable energy and the…
Energy Policy Trends training featured image
Training

Energy Policy Trends

Covers trends in clean energy, emerging issues in energy policy, and recent legislation and policies.
electric transmission lines lower electricity costs for consumers
Training

Utility Tactics: How Utilities Achieve Their Goals

Utilities generally aim to protect shareholders by increasing profits and decreasing costs. Utilities have an…
Media Article

Massachusetts outlines new strategy for getting customers and utilities off gas

After more than three years of considering the future of the natural gas industry in Massachusetts and what role it can play in the state's efforts to significantly reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, the state's Department of Public Utilities issued an order meant to signal to gas utilities that it won't be business as usual going forward.
African American volunteer and her coworkers talk while organizing donations at community center.
Media Article

Advancing Environmental Justice through Community Based Participatory Research

A journal article from We Act for Environmental Justice, discusses how community based participatory research builds capacity in communities and ensures government agencies and academic institutions are better able to incorporate community concerns into their research agendas.
Energy Democracy 101 training hero image
Press Release

Peoples Gas Rate Case Decision Pivotal for Customers and Clean Energy Transition

CHICAGO (Nov 16, 2023) – The Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) decided today on a controversial Peoples Gas rate case which environmental and public interest organizations applaud as a departure from previous rate proceedings and an overall victory benefiting customers. The Commission rejected a significant part of Peoples rate hike request, disallowing $265 million that Peoples requested for new pipes and $236 million for new buildings. Additionally, the Commission ordered the company to participate in a Future of Gas proceeding and to file new plans for its system every two years. The Commission made similar orders in Nicor Gas and Ameren Gas rate cases, collectively reducing utility rate requests by many millions of dollars. “Today’s decision marks critical progress in the fight for a cleaner, more affordable energy future. We applaud the ICC for hearing community concerns. And we also know there’s still a long road ahead for environmental justice communities like mine, where the cost of natural gas goes beyond just unaffordable rates,” says Cheryl Johnson, Executive Director of People for Community Recovery. “Across Chicago’s south and west sides, legacy contamination and poor outdoor air quality have contributed to disproportionate rates of respiratory illness. Gas stoves are making those worse. We’re glad to see the ICC pushing pause on future gas infrastructure investments and we hope Mayor Johnson and the Chicago city council take an important next step by supporting policies that transition homes and buildings away from dirty, expensive natural gas.” This decision comes at a time where Illinoians are struggling to pay their bills and as advocates call for a transition away from the gas system to meet our state climate goals. The ICC's determination in the gas rate case provides some concrete steps in achieving those objectives, according to advocates. “This decision is forward-thinking because it signals a commitment to our State’s climate goals by providing an actual framework for equitably winding down the gas system,” says Madeline Semanisin, NRDC Midwest Building Decarbonzation Advocate. The Commission rejected the company’s proposed fixed charge and implemented a robust low income discount program. These changes can lead to lower customer bills and promote and reward energy efficiency. “This order is virtually unprecedented in terms of changing the system that for far too long has benefited utilities at the expense of consumers,” says Rob Kelter, Managing Attorney, Environmental Law & Policy Center. “Today reflects the commitment from the commission and Governor Pritzker to reduce carbon emissions and move toward electrification and renewable energy. The ICC made it clear today that it will take charge of a robust planning process that will accelerate that shift.” The decision mandates a Future of Gas proceeding that will lay the groundwork for a comprehensive strategy to address the long-term challenges associated with the gas system. “Today’s decision is a major victory for Chicagoans forced to pay ever-escalating bills for the failing Peoples Gas pipe replacement program. At long-last, regulators are holding Peoples Gas and its troubled program accountable,” says Abe Scarr, Director of Illinois PIRG. “Today we got three decisions from the Illinois Commerce Commission that are a really big deal. Illinois just took vital steps toward aligning its gas systems with its overall clean energy goals, and toward affordable power for all Illinois families in the future,” says Christie Hicks, Senior Director for Equitable Regulatory Solutions for Environmental Defense Fund. ###
34 states have climate equity policies in place as of 2023
Blog

EDF’s new equity map shows state efforts to make the energy transition fairer for all

Across the U.S. states are passing laws that will ensure greater equity as we transition to a clean energy system. EDF has developed an interactive map – based on our new report, the State Climate Equity Survey – that documents states’ efforts to make their energy transition more equitable and healthier. Our new map identifies which states require, allow, or promote consideration of equity and environmental justice in agency decision-making and budget-setting.