Skip to main content

What is a Utility Rate Case

Training

What is a Utility Rate Case?

A utility is a business providing a public service — natural gas, electricity, water — subject to special government rules. Natural gas and electricity utilities are granted monopolies to distribute energy in their service areas, and the amount of profit they are allowed to earn is regulated by the state.

Traditionally, utilities’ profits are a percentage of money invested in the distribution part of the system – how it delivers gas or electricity to buildings and provide service to the customer (end-user). A utility files a rate case to ask state regulators for permission to invest new money — and raise customers’ gas or electricity rates to recoup that investment. In Illinois, the regulator in charge of this decision is the Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC).

The ICC’s mission is to balance the interests of consumers and public utilities to ensure adequate, efficient, reliable, safe, and least-cost utility services, while promoting the development of an effectively competitive energy supplier market.

Questions that arise in rate cases include concepts open to interpretation: What is the “public interest”? What investments are “prudent and reasonable”? What is the meaning of Reliable? Safe? Efficient? Equitable?

New visions

Traditional rate cases center around a utility’s planned investment, but new visions for our current energy system consider other values: meeting state climate goals; addressing the health impacts of pollution in communities; looking at whether the quality of service is the same across neighborhoods; analyzing whether all customers can access clean energy.

Participating in rate cases

There are various ways to be part of the decision-making process at the ICC, but participation as an official “party” to cases is the only way to influence requests filed by utilities formally. Only testimony from parties to the case can be on the record, and only material officially on the record can be considered in decision-making. Still, building relationships with ICC commissioners and participating in stakeholder forums can be very influential when policies are being developed.

Community testimony

In 2022, Environmental Defense Fund pioneered a new technique: highlighting the critical, real-life experiences of community members as official, expert testimony in a rate case. Commissioners heard directly from community members about the effects of policy decisions — less reliable service (longer, more frequent outages) and poorer air quality — in their neighborhoods, where residents are more likely to be low-income, Black, and brown people. This evidence of inequality made a difference: The Illinois Commerce Commission stated that EDF and the Citizens Utility Board raised its awareness that environmental justice communities experience longer and more frequent power outages than wealthier communities, while also having fewer resources to withstand and recover from disruptions.

Illinois Rate Cases 2023

In January 2023, all three of Illinois’ gas distribution utilities filed rate cases with the ICC. At the same time, the state’s two electric utilities filed multi-year rate plans. Together, these five rate hikes would cost Illinois ratepayers an extra $1.8 billion every year.

The burden is on the utilities to convince the ICC that their requests meet a “just and reasonable” standard. The ICC’s final decisions are due in December 2023.

Fairness and equity goals

Throughout 2023 partners developed data and testimony to demonstrate that these large proposed rate hikes – especially those that will encourage fossil fuel use – are not in the best interest of customers, are inequitable, and do not align with state climate goals. Our goal, instead, is to accelerate an affordable clean energy transition, including directing investments to communities that have historically borne the highest burdens from the energy system, while enjoying the least benefits from it.

Rate case decisions must be made based on information or evidence introduced on the record by parties to the case through filings, discovery, and testimony.

Are you interested in testifying in a utility rate case?
Become a certified energy justice intervenor.

Additional Trainings

Utility rate case hero image
Training

What is a Utility Rate Case

Natural gas and electricity utilities are subject to special government rules, and the amount of…
Ethical Storytelling training featured image
Training

Ethical Storytelling

Ethical storytelling puts people and communities who have been harmed together with organizations, collaborating to…
Energy Democracy 101 training featured image
Training

Energy Democracy 101

In an energy democracy, frontline communities and their allies have a strong voice and leading…
Training

Foundations of Energy Equity

In an equitable energy system, everyone has access to safe and reliable energy and the…
Energy Policy Trends training featured image
Training

Energy Policy Trends

Covers trends in clean energy, emerging issues in energy policy, and recent legislation and policies.
electric transmission lines lower electricity costs for consumers
Training

Utility Tactics: How Utilities Achieve Their Goals

Utilities generally aim to protect shareholders by increasing profits and decreasing costs. Utilities have an…
Boston, Massachusetts, USA Skyline
Media Article

The richest Americans account for 40 percent of U.S. climate emissions

The richest 10 percent of U.S. households are responsible for 40 percent of the country’s greenhouse gas emissions, according to a study released Thursday in PLOS Climate. The study, which looked at how a household’s income generated emissions, underlines the stark divide between those who benefit most from fossil fuels and those who are most burdened by its effects. “It just seems morally and politically problematic to have one group of people reaping so much benefit from emissions while the poorer groups in society are asked to disproportionately deal with the harms of those emissions,” Starr, a sustainability scientist at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, said. Previous research has shown that extreme weather events made worse because of climate change, from flooding to hurricanes, often have a greater effect on lower-income communities.
Media Article

Peoples Gas seeks record-high gas bill increase for customers

Environmental and community activists turned out in Chicago to protest against Peoples Gas' request for a $402 million rate hike for next year. "We don’t think consumers should be having to spend more money to rebuild fossil fuel pipelines," said activist Caroline Wooten. Dozens of activists showed up to Thursday's Illinois Commerce Commission meeting to make their final plea before the commission votes on November 16.
Dr. Jifunza Wright-Carter speaks at a protest
Media Article

Farmers Reject Nicor’s Pipe Dream

An article from In These Times discusses why Black farmers in Pembroke, IL want an energy upgrade to renewables, not fossil fuels.
Energy Democracy 101 training hero image
Press Release

Peoples Gas Rate Case Decision Pivotal for Customers and Clean Energy Transition

CHICAGO (Nov 16, 2023) – The Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) decided today on a controversial Peoples Gas rate case which environmental and public interest organizations applaud as a departure from previous rate proceedings and an overall victory benefiting customers. The Commission rejected a significant part of Peoples rate hike request, disallowing $265 million that Peoples requested for new pipes and $236 million for new buildings. Additionally, the Commission ordered the company to participate in a Future of Gas proceeding and to file new plans for its system every two years. The Commission made similar orders in Nicor Gas and Ameren Gas rate cases, collectively reducing utility rate requests by many millions of dollars. “Today’s decision marks critical progress in the fight for a cleaner, more affordable energy future. We applaud the ICC for hearing community concerns. And we also know there’s still a long road ahead for environmental justice communities like mine, where the cost of natural gas goes beyond just unaffordable rates,” says Cheryl Johnson, Executive Director of People for Community Recovery. “Across Chicago’s south and west sides, legacy contamination and poor outdoor air quality have contributed to disproportionate rates of respiratory illness. Gas stoves are making those worse. We’re glad to see the ICC pushing pause on future gas infrastructure investments and we hope Mayor Johnson and the Chicago city council take an important next step by supporting policies that transition homes and buildings away from dirty, expensive natural gas.” This decision comes at a time where Illinoians are struggling to pay their bills and as advocates call for a transition away from the gas system to meet our state climate goals. The ICC's determination in the gas rate case provides some concrete steps in achieving those objectives, according to advocates. “This decision is forward-thinking because it signals a commitment to our State’s climate goals by providing an actual framework for equitably winding down the gas system,” says Madeline Semanisin, NRDC Midwest Building Decarbonzation Advocate. The Commission rejected the company’s proposed fixed charge and implemented a robust low income discount program. These changes can lead to lower customer bills and promote and reward energy efficiency. “This order is virtually unprecedented in terms of changing the system that for far too long has benefited utilities at the expense of consumers,” says Rob Kelter, Managing Attorney, Environmental Law & Policy Center. “Today reflects the commitment from the commission and Governor Pritzker to reduce carbon emissions and move toward electrification and renewable energy. The ICC made it clear today that it will take charge of a robust planning process that will accelerate that shift.” The decision mandates a Future of Gas proceeding that will lay the groundwork for a comprehensive strategy to address the long-term challenges associated with the gas system. “Today’s decision is a major victory for Chicagoans forced to pay ever-escalating bills for the failing Peoples Gas pipe replacement program. At long-last, regulators are holding Peoples Gas and its troubled program accountable,” says Abe Scarr, Director of Illinois PIRG. “Today we got three decisions from the Illinois Commerce Commission that are a really big deal. Illinois just took vital steps toward aligning its gas systems with its overall clean energy goals, and toward affordable power for all Illinois families in the future,” says Christie Hicks, Senior Director for Equitable Regulatory Solutions for Environmental Defense Fund. ###