Skip to main content

Chris Neme

Technical Expert Testimony

Chris Neme

Chris Neme, co-founder and principal of Energy Futures Group, testified in a case before the Illinois Commerce Commission involving a proposed rate increase by Peoples Gas.

Neme presented analysis assessing the cost-effectiveness of transitioning forced air gas heating systems to electric systems for the average single-family homeowner in Peoples Gas service territory. His analysis determined that electrification of single-family homes that formerly had gas furnaces was cost-effective and energy bills for customers switching to electric supply were hundreds of dollars lower in the very first year. He also demonstrated how greenhouse gas emissions are reduced when a home is electrified.

Neme provided recommendations to mitigate risks ratepayers could face as a result of broad electrification. He recommended that the Commission initiate a “future of gas” process to identify the most likely pathways to decarbonizing the current Illinois fossil fuel system and the impacts that those pathways might have on gas and electric rates and bills, including an in-depth exploration of regulatory policy changes that could be appropriate to mitigate financial risks to gas ratepayers.

Are you interested in testifying in a utility rate case?
Become a certified energy justice intervenor.

More Testimonies

Microphone in a court room
Community Expert Testimony

Wasiu Adesope

Community expert Cheryl Watson testified that utility policies contribute to and exacerbate cumulative burdens to disadvantaged communities and must be changed. Utilities need to be more holistic and community centered, planning with the community, not for them.
Microphone in a court room
Technical Expert Testimony

Andrew Barbeau

Technical expert Andrew Barbeau testified that ComEd’s proposal to use system-wide metrics to measure reliability disadvantages the residents of more vulnerable frontline communities. Instead, the needs of these communities must be front and center in the utility’s plans.
Microphone in a court room
Community Expert Testimony

Gregory Norris

Community expert Gregory Norris, founder of an environmental justice organization, testified that lack of affordable energy has an outsized impact on Black and brown neighborhoods. Solutions will only be implemented justly if there is intention and accountability. ComEd can use tenets of energy justice to guide grid planning.
Microphone in a court room
Community Expert Testimony

Kelly McCleary

Community expert Kelly McCleary testified that higher rates can lead to a cascade of problems. The higher rates get, the fewer customers will be able to afford to invest in clean energy, including energy efficiency, and save in the future. Utilities should invest in making the grid more ready for renewable energy, not just user rate hikes to garner higher profits for shareholders.
Microphone in a court room
Community Expert Testimony

Ryan O’Donnell

Community expert Ryan O'Donnell testified that communities should have energy sovereignty, meaning some degree of ownership over the means of energy production. Benefits of the Climate and Equitable Jobs Act (CEJA) should be visible, making the system more fair and balanced environmentally and economically.
Microphone in a court room
Community Expert Testimony

Cheryl Watson

Community expert Cheryl Watson testified that utility policies contribute to and exacerbate cumulative burdens to disadvantaged communities and must be changed. Utilities need to be more holistic and community centered, planning with the community, not for them.
Microphone in a court room
Technical Expert Testimony

Justin Schott

Technical expert Justin Schott testified that Peoples Gas’ disconnection and late fee practices and qualifications for low-income discounts are placing undue energy burdens on BIPOC communities.
Microphone in a court room
Technical Expert Testimony

Chris Neme

Technical expert Chris Neme testified that transitioning single-family homes from gas furnaces to electricity is cost-effective for the average homeowner in Peoples Gas service territory.
Customers read a utility bill
BlogFeatured

Equity, Affordability and Access in the Clean Energy Transition

As states turn toward a clean energy transition, affordability and access must be an integral part of the discussion. Otherwise, equity may be compromised. Black and Brown communities experience higher energy rates and higher rates of power disconnection due to many overlapping historical and modern factors such as housing injustice, racial segregation, and wealth disparities. On average, Black and Hispanic households are at least two times more likely to have their utility service, a critical basic need, disconnected than White households. Further, to cut down on their cost of energy, some households may resort to adjusting temperatures to unhealthy levels, resulting in negative health impacts. This further contributes to disparate health impacts experienced by Black and Brown communities. Equity and affordability on regulators’ radar In Massachusetts, the Department of Public Utilities recently determined that total energy burdens should be no more than six percent of shelter costs. In addition, the DPU is seeking further stakeholder comments on where target levels (below six percent) should be set when designing tiered discount rates that benefit the highest number of customers. The DPU is also seeking comments on whether revenue shortfalls from discounted rates should be recovered statewide instead of utility-wide, and whether all stakeholders should contribute to recovery of the revenue shortfall. Through these investigations, the DPU is for the first time working to increase energy affordability for Massachusetts ratepayers. Energy regulatory commissions around the country are, like Massachusetts, beginning to address issues of equity, affordability and access. As states strive to meet their climate goals in the coming years by transitioning to an electric-powered grid, energy affordability is more important than ever from an environmental justice and equity perspective. Currently, the federal government provides funding to states to support low-income ratepayers. Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) provides federal funding assistance to reduce the costs associated with home energy bills, energy crises, weatherization, and minor energy-related home repairs. States receive the funding and distribute it based on their own policies. States and individual utility companies also provide various payment assistance programs. Although helpful, such programs do not fully address the energy burdens faced by many households. Further, many people are not enrolled in any kind of low-income assistance program because they do not self-identify as low-income, therefore marketing for financial support programs needs to be improved to increase enrollment. Many middle-income people are also struggling to afford high energy bills that are taking a large chunk out of their income, but they do not qualify under the income thresholds for low-income assistance programs. More data, language access will help State energy regulators should collect more data about the usage behaviors for different households and demographics to help people determine the programs that could relieve some of the burden of their energy bill. Regulators should also look to ensure low-income customers have access to and can benefit from clean energy infrastructure. Energy regulators should consider ways to leverage funding from the Inflation Reduction Act and other sources to provide heat pump rebates to low- and moderate-income homes. They should also consider novel approaches, such as percentage of income payment plans. This rate structure avoids leaving median-income individuals without support. As state energy regulators navigate the clean energy transition and equity issues, they must also consider language access, which. ensures that everyone can receive information on how to access rate support programs. State energy regulators should consider implementing current EPA guidance on best practices for language access, which includes translating information into every language spoken by at least five percent of people in the relevant area. State energy regulators should err on the side of over-inclusivity in translation to non-English languages. Environmental justice must be considered in every aspect of the energy transition. From access to translated information to access to heat in the middle of winter, no one should be left behind. EDF is working to ensure that equity concerns are at the forefront of policy conversations at public utility commissions. Haley Maher is a third year law student at the University of Colorado. This blog is based on her research as an intern at Environmental Defense Fund in summer 2024.   Memmott, T., Carley, S., Graff, M. et al. Sociodemographic disparities in energy insecurity among low-income households before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat Energy 6, 186–193 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00763-9 DPU Issues Notice of Investigation on Energy Affordability for Massachusetts Ratepayers, Department of Public Utilities, https://www.mass.gov/news/dpu-issues-notice-of-investigation-on-energy-affordability-for-massachusetts-ratepayers Affordability and Energy Bills, Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies, https://puc.colorado.gov/affordability#:~:text=The%20Commission's%20Affordability%20Initiative%20demonstrates,a%20letter%20from%20Governor%20Polis. Massachusetts Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), Benefits.gov, last accessed Aug 6, 2024, https://www.benefits.gov/benefit/1576 Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), Benefits.gov, https://www.benefits.gov/benefit/623 About Us, Mass Save, Last accessed Aug. 6 2024, https://www.masssave.com/en/about-us Paying for Power a Struggle for Some, Consumer Watchdog, https://consumerwatchdog.org/uncategorized/paying-power-struggle-some/ Guidance to Environmental Protection Agency Financial Assistance Recipients Regarding Title VI Prohibition Against National Origin Discrimination Affecting Limited English Proficient Persons, 69 F.R. 35602, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2004-06-25/pdf/04- 14464.pdf
Energy Democracy 101 training hero image
Press Release

Peoples Gas Rate Case Decision Pivotal for Customers and Clean Energy Transition

CHICAGO (Nov 16, 2023) – The Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) decided today on a controversial Peoples Gas rate case which environmental and public interest organizations applaud as a departure from previous rate proceedings and an overall victory benefiting customers. The Commission rejected a significant part of Peoples rate hike request, disallowing $265 million that Peoples requested for new pipes and $236 million for new buildings. Additionally, the Commission ordered the company to participate in a Future of Gas proceeding and to file new plans for its system every two years. The Commission made similar orders in Nicor Gas and Ameren Gas rate cases, collectively reducing utility rate requests by many millions of dollars. “Today’s decision marks critical progress in the fight for a cleaner, more affordable energy future. We applaud the ICC for hearing community concerns. And we also know there’s still a long road ahead for environmental justice communities like mine, where the cost of natural gas goes beyond just unaffordable rates,” says Cheryl Johnson, Executive Director of People for Community Recovery. “Across Chicago’s south and west sides, legacy contamination and poor outdoor air quality have contributed to disproportionate rates of respiratory illness. Gas stoves are making those worse. We’re glad to see the ICC pushing pause on future gas infrastructure investments and we hope Mayor Johnson and the Chicago city council take an important next step by supporting policies that transition homes and buildings away from dirty, expensive natural gas.” This decision comes at a time where Illinoians are struggling to pay their bills and as advocates call for a transition away from the gas system to meet our state climate goals. The ICC's determination in the gas rate case provides some concrete steps in achieving those objectives, according to advocates. “This decision is forward-thinking because it signals a commitment to our State’s climate goals by providing an actual framework for equitably winding down the gas system,” says Madeline Semanisin, NRDC Midwest Building Decarbonzation Advocate. The Commission rejected the company’s proposed fixed charge and implemented a robust low income discount program. These changes can lead to lower customer bills and promote and reward energy efficiency. “This order is virtually unprecedented in terms of changing the system that for far too long has benefited utilities at the expense of consumers,” says Rob Kelter, Managing Attorney, Environmental Law & Policy Center. “Today reflects the commitment from the commission and Governor Pritzker to reduce carbon emissions and move toward electrification and renewable energy. The ICC made it clear today that it will take charge of a robust planning process that will accelerate that shift.” The decision mandates a Future of Gas proceeding that will lay the groundwork for a comprehensive strategy to address the long-term challenges associated with the gas system. “Today’s decision is a major victory for Chicagoans forced to pay ever-escalating bills for the failing Peoples Gas pipe replacement program. At long-last, regulators are holding Peoples Gas and its troubled program accountable,” says Abe Scarr, Director of Illinois PIRG. “Today we got three decisions from the Illinois Commerce Commission that are a really big deal. Illinois just took vital steps toward aligning its gas systems with its overall clean energy goals, and toward affordable power for all Illinois families in the future,” says Christie Hicks, Senior Director for Equitable Regulatory Solutions for Environmental Defense Fund. ###
urban lights at night in winter
Media Article

Understanding energy behaviors for a more equitable future

Dr. Destenie Nock published a new study based on research in Chicago showing that low-income households turn on their cooling systems in hot weather three degrees later than higher income households, but they turn on heat in cold weather six degrees earlier than high income households, whether because of poor insulation or other reasons. “This work highlights the challenges low-income communities face. Not only are they at higher risk in the summer, but in the winter they have to spend a lot more money to protect their pipes from freezing,” noted Nock. “The financial stress of heating homes in winter can also lead to broader inequities.” Dr. Nock's data can be used to shape policies that address systemic inequities, guide investments in infrastructure, and help improve living conditions for energy-insecure and vulnerable households. Dr. Nock has provided expert testimony in Illinois rate case proceedings.
34 states have climate equity policies in place as of 2023
Blog

EDF’s new equity map shows state efforts to make the energy transition fairer for all

Across the U.S. states are passing laws that will ensure greater equity as we transition to a clean energy system. EDF has developed an interactive map – based on our new report, the State Climate Equity Survey – that documents states’ efforts to make their energy transition more equitable and healthier. Our new map identifies which states require, allow, or promote consideration of equity and environmental justice in agency decision-making and budget-setting.