Skip to main content

Utility Tactics: How Utilities Achieve Their Goals

Training

Utility Tactics: How Utilities Achieve Their Goals

Background: How public utilities were formed

Utilities were initially created to facilitate investment in a public service that was difficult for individuals to provide on their own. In the 1930s, agreements were reached in states to create regulated monopoly utilities, usually investor-owned. Other ownership structures, such as municipal ownership and electric coops, have generally less commission oversight.

In Illinois, utilities are required to deliver reliable electricity that’s as clean and low-cost as possible. As described in state documents, electricity must me “adequate, efficient, reliable, environmentally safe, and least cost.

In exchange for their service, utilities are allowed to recover costs and a profit, called a “guaranteed rate of return.” In Illinois, ICC reviews and approves costs that are “prudent and reasonable.”

Utilities generally aim to protect shareholders by increasing profits and decreasing costs. Utilities have an incentive to build out infrastructure: for operational costs they can only recoup the cost of operations, but for capital investments they can recoup costs plus a profit.

Utility influence

Utilities aim to maintain a positive brand image and minimize outside influence. They derive their influence through enormous lobbying expenses, and through allies in the oil and gas industry such as the Koch Brothers, Edison Electric Institute, the American Petroleum Institute, American Gas Association, and “big oil” including Exxon, Shell and BP.

Big oil takes in enormous earnings — $32.6 billion in just Q1 of 2023 — and spends an enormous amount on lobbying: five oil companies spent a combined $452.6 million lobbying the federal government since 2011, and around $750 million annually on climate-focused communications.

Problematic tactics

Greenwashing

Companies make commitments toward a cleaner energy future but their actions do not align with this vision. Most big oil lobbying money goes toward policies that are oppositional to clean energy progress and international climate commitments. Gas companies misleadingly market themselves as “clean,” even move away from saying “oil” and “gas” in favor of terms like “integrated energy.”

Misinformation through media

Influencers, social media and others amplify misinformation, with messages such as: “it would be dangerous to rely only on renewables,” “don’t let anyone take away your energy choices,” “food tastes better cooked on a gas range,” or “solar is a trick by wealthy people to make poor people pay more for their energy.” Historically, media have failed to connect climate impacts to climate change or fossil fuels, much less naming the companies most responsible for the problem.

Using donations to build support and advance goals

Utilities often give money to local groups and political leaders to quell criticism and mute voices for change.

Investing in costly fossil fuel infrastructure that blocks clean energy progress

Fossil infrastructure proposals baked into integrated resource plans, and incentives for false solutions like hydrogen and carbon capture, result in profits staying in the hands of the few, preserving the old energy ways.

New policies could start to change the model

  • Ban or limit utility political spending
  • Ensure customer payments are not being used to enable utilities to pay for trade association membership dues or to lobby against community interests.
  • Implement performance-based incentives or ratemaking that provide
  • Conduct third party evaluations on programs (energy efficiency, bill assistance, outreach, workforce diversity)
  • Integrated Resource Plans with equitable investments in clean energy and energy efficiency measures
Are you interested in testifying in a utility rate case?
Become a certified energy justice intervenor.

Additional Trainings

Utility rate case hero image
Training

What is a Utility Rate Case

Natural gas and electricity utilities are subject to special government rules, and the amount of…
Ethical Storytelling training featured image
Training

Ethical Storytelling

Ethical storytelling puts people and communities who have been harmed together with organizations, collaborating to…
Energy Democracy 101 training featured image
Training

Energy Democracy 101

In an energy democracy, frontline communities and their allies have a strong voice and leading…
Training

Foundations of Energy Equity

In an equitable energy system, everyone has access to safe and reliable energy and the…
Energy Policy Trends training featured image
Training

Energy Policy Trends

Covers trends in clean energy, emerging issues in energy policy, and recent legislation and policies.
electric transmission lines lower electricity costs for consumers
Training

Utility Tactics: How Utilities Achieve Their Goals

Utilities generally aim to protect shareholders by increasing profits and decreasing costs. Utilities have an…
Pipeline running through agricultural area
Media Article

Legitimizing Situated Knowledge in Rural Communities Through Storytelling Around Gas Pipelines and Environmental Risk

A scholarly article from the November 2021 issue of Technical Communication, demonstrates that rural landowners and community members’ place-based knowledge is expertise that should be considered by technical communication professionals.
Media Article

Peoples Gas seeks record-high gas bill increase for customers

Environmental and community activists turned out in Chicago to protest against Peoples Gas' request for a $402 million rate hike for next year. "We don’t think consumers should be having to spend more money to rebuild fossil fuel pipelines," said activist Caroline Wooten. Dozens of activists showed up to Thursday's Illinois Commerce Commission meeting to make their final plea before the commission votes on November 16.
Media Article

Consumer advocates say regulators should slash Ameren Illinois’ proposed $134M rate hike

Consumer advocates are pushing back against Ameren Illinois’ $134 million rate hike request for natural gas services that’s currently before state regulators. The watchdog groups contend the Illinois Commerce Commission, the state regulatory body, should reject at least two-thirds of the proposal. “t Ameren’s bid for a $134 million rate hike is unjust, unreasonable — and at least triple what the utility can possibly justify,” said Jim Chilsen, a spokesman for the Citizens Utility Boardy. The affordability issues and reducing expenditures on infrastructure by Ameren are “also the best solutions for a healthy, livable planet,” said Curt Stokes, an attorney with the Environmental Defense Fund. “Expanding and just doubling down on investments in this natural gas distribution system is not going to get Illinois to a zero carbon economy by 2050,” Stokes said.
Chicago neighborhood
FeaturedMedia Article

The Expert Next Door

An article from the winter 2023 edition of EDF’s Solutions, about how EDF attorney Christie Hicks is working with communities in Chicago to get resident voices into the rooms where energy decisions are being made.